tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31054795.post3417222254603023735..comments2009-05-22T12:38:12.282-07:00Ravenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00700235246831229213noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31054795.post-77288996051599866622009-05-22T12:38:12.282-07:002009-05-22T12:38:12.282-07:00My Transformers review reviewer showed up one day and critiqued every movie review I had written.<br /><br />Hilarious stuff, but I don't think intentionally.<br /><br />Where Star Trek really went off the rails was the application of the traditional Trek story arc ("plucky crew with no backup creatively solves seemingly insurmountable problems") to a location where backup should have been the rule rather than the exception. Every Captain memorizes the codes to completely deactivate Earth's defenses? And all other ships are off in the "Laurentian System"? Sheesh.Ravenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00700235246831229213noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31054795.post-48702218986959675552009-05-09T22:03:00.000-07:002009-05-09T22:03:00.000-07:00I haven't seen Transformers, but I can get some sort of idea of the camera work by looking at the Star Trek trailer. <br /><br />I was trying to figure out if the impassioned defense of the Transformers movie in your other post by a commenter was satire or not ... read as satire it's quite funny. Read as unintentional satire it's even more funny.Anthonyhttp://www.anthny.comnoreply@blogger.com